This appeal was dismissed for abatement as the respondent/accused was reported to be dead. No substantial legal proposition was laid down as the order did not dispose of the matter on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.998 OF 2011
BETWEEN:
Sri. K.P.Ramesh Aged about 42 years S/o. late K.S.Puttaswamy Residing at No.1639, 1st cross Ramamohanpuram Bangalore – 560 021 ...Appellant (By Sri.K.Suman, Advocate Appeared through video conferencing) AND:
Sri. B.R.Nagaraj Gupta Major S/o. Sri. B.R.Ramakrishnaiah Settee R/a. No.5, 3rd Cross Maleshwaram Bangalore – 560 003 And also at: Keerthi Enterprises No.16, 1st Floor, Central Street 5th Block, Kumara Park West Bangalore – 560 020 …Respondent (By Sri. C.D.Shivanna, Advocate (Absent))
2
This criminal appeal is filed under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the order dated 19.7.11 passed by the XVIII ACMM & XX ASCJ, Bangalore in C.C.No.2780/06 acquitting the respondent/accused for the offence p/u/s 138 of N.I.Act.,
This appeal Coming on for hearing this day, the Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
respondent/accused is reported to be dead.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as abated.
Sd/JUDGE
HJ
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.P.Ramesh
B.R.Nagaraj Gupta
N.K. Sudhindrarao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
