The High Court dismissed a criminal petition for bail on the ground that the petitioner was not interested in prosecuting the matter after consistent absence of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.P.No.7051/2020
1
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.7051/2020
BETWEEN :
PURUSHOTHAM @ BILLAL S/O JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.113 ANNAMMANALPALYA BANDEPALYA NEAR GAREBHAVIPALYA HOSUR ROAD, BENGALURU – 571 401 …PETITIONER
(BY SRI HARISH PRABHU.S, ADVOCATE)
AND :
STATE BY SHESHADRIPURAM POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY HIGH COURT SPP BANGALORE – 560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI H.R.SHOWRI, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.24/2016 (S.C.NO.696/2016) OF SESHADRIPURAM POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 395, 397, 120B OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.P.No.7051/2020
2
O R D E R
No representation for the petitioner. On the previous hearing date also, there was no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Therefore, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
KSR
1 issue framed by the court
whether to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the underlying criminal case
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PURUSHOTHAM @ BILLAL
STATE
K.S. MUDAGAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
