This is an order in a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of an FIR. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, reserving liberty to file a fresh one after the charge sheet. The court accepted the withdrawal.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition after charge sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.P.No.3238 of 2020
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3238 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
(BY SRI.SHREE RAM TIMMAPPA NAYAK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
CRL.P.No.3238 of 2020
2
BANGALORE, KARNATAKA.
(BY SMT.RASHMI JADHAV, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.19/2020 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 420 OF IPC FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE AND TRIAL BY THE XI ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE BENGALURU AT MAYO HALL UNIT AT BENGALURU.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
CRL.P.No.3238 of 2020
3
petition is dismissed as withdrawn .
Sd/JUDGE
SSD
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRINANJUNDAIAH AND ANR.
STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
