Criminal Petitioner challenged an order regarding fine deposit. Court accepted counselsubmission that Petitioner complied, dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.P. No.2518 OF 2020
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2518 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
MR. VENKATESH S/O MUDDANNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1138 SANDESH, NANJAPPA LAYOUT BANNERUGATTA ROAD, ARAKERE BENGALURU-560076 ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.GIRISH.D.S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MR. ABHISHEK KARANTH S/O GOPALAKRISHNAKARANTH AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.B55 P ADMASHREENIVASA MOODUBETTUU, KULAI MANGALORE-575019 ... RESPONDENT
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C, PRAYING TO MODIFY THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 26.12.2019 PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANGALORE, D.K., IN CRL.A.NO.225/2019 BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE PETITION AND THEREBY PERMITTING THE PETITIONER TO DEPOSIT 20 PERCENT OF THE FINE AMOUNT WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF IMPUGNED ORDER.
CRL.P. No.2518 OF 2020
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Prs*
Mr. Venkatesh s/o Muddanna
Mr. Abhishek Karanth s/o Gopalakrishnakarant
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
