Yamanavva v. the State
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. dismissed. Alleged misappropriation of public funds by collusion between public servants. Investigation at initial stage; accused absconding.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner not entitled to anticipatory bail; petition dismissed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G. UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.200537/2020
BETWEEN:
Yamanavva W/o Mallikarjun Natikar Age: 38 Years, Occ: President of GP At Sathakhed, R/o Kadahalli Tq. Jewargi, Dist: Kalaburagi - 585310
… Petitioner
(By Smt. Triveni, Advocate for Sri Basavaling Nasi, Advocate)
AND:
The State through Jewargi P.S. Represented through Addl. S.P.P. High Court of Karnataka At Kalaburagi Bench - 585102
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in a corruption case involving misappropriation of public funds where investigation is at the initial stage and accused are absconding.
Whether a public servant can be released on anticipatory bail when allegations involve cheating by forging documents and misappropriation of huge public money.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Yamanavva W/o Mallikarjun Natikar
- respondent
The State through Jewargi P.S.
Coram
M.G. Uma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/200537/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court