The Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench, dismissed a criminal petition seeking to quash an FIR under Section 498A IPC, accepting that the petition had become infructuous due to pendency of a related petition.
No relief. The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101573/2017
BETWEEN:
(By Sri. Shrikant T. Patil, Advocate)
Crl.P.No.101573/2017
: 2 :
AND:
...Respondents
(Sri. Praveen Uppar, HCGP for R1; Sri. N.D.Gunde, Advocate for R2)
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to quash the registration of complaint and FIR for the offence punishable under Section 498A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC in Mahila P.S. Crime No.42 of 2017 dated 22.06.2017 on the file of the JMFC II Court, Belagavi.
This petition coming on for Admission through physical hearing/video conferencing hearing this day, the court made the following:
Crl.P.No.101573/2017
: 3 :
ORDER
Learned counsels from both sides are physically present in the Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the present petition and also makes an oral submission that, in view of the pendency of the Criminal Petition No.100861/2018, the present petition be dismissed as having become infructuous.
The respondents submit their no objection.
In view of the memo and supporting submission from both sides, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
*Svh/-
Sd/JUDGE
Smt. Chinnavva W/o. Basappa Kappalguddi and Others
The State of Karnataka
Smt. Shweta W/o. Manjunath Kappalguddi
H.B. Prabhakar Swamy
Dr. Justice H.B. Prabhakara Swamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
