This order addresses two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings for NI Act offences. The High Court dismissed both petitions as they were filed as not pressed by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 24th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101303/2019
C/W
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101304/2019
IN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101303/2019
Between:
Shri Raman Govardhan Arora, Age: 54 years, occ.: business, r/o. T-1 Venkatesh Vijay Ratansi Nagar, College Corner, A/p. Sangli, Dist: Sangli.
(By Sri M.B. Gundawade, Advocate)
And:
Shri. Vikas Annaso Bedkyale, Age: 45 years, Occ: Agriculture, r/o. Kagwad, Tq: Kagwad, Dist: Belagavi-590 001.
Crl.P.No.101303/2019 C/w. Crl.P.No.101304/2019
: 2 :
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the entire proceedings of C.C. No. 855/2019 pending on the file of the IV Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC Court, Athani, for the offences punishable u/s 138, 142 of N.I. Act & etc.
IN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101304/2019
Between:
Shri Raman Govardhan Arora, Age: 54 years, occ.: business, r/o. T-1 Venkatesh Vijay Ratansi Nagar, College Corner, A/p. Sangli, Dist: Sangli. - Petitioner (By Sri M.B. Gundawade, Advocate) And:
Shri. Vikas Annaso Bedkyale, Age: 45 years, Occ: Agriculture, r/o. Kagwad, Tq: Kagwad, Dist: Belagavi-590 001.
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the entire proceedings of C.C. No. 856/2019 pending on the file of the IV Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC Court, Athani, for the offences punishable u/s 138, 142 of N.I. Act & etc.
Crl.P.No.101303/2019 C/w. Crl.P.No.101304/2019
: 3 :
These Criminal petitions coming on for Admission through physical hearing/video conferencing hearing this day, the court made the following:
ORDER
Learned counsels from both sides are physically present in the Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner in both the petitions files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petitions as not pressed.
In the memo it is stated that, the criminal cases from which the present petitions have arisen are progressing for recording the evidence, as such, the petitioner is not interested to proceed in the present petitions.
The supporting submission is made from the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits his no objection for considering the memo as prayed.
Crl.P.No.101303/2019 C/w. Crl.P.No.101304/2019
: 4 :
In view of the memo and supporting submission
both the petitions are dismissed as not pressed.
In view of dismissal of the petitions, I.A. No. 1/2019 in both the petitions do not survive for consideration.
SD
JUDGE
bvv
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Raman Govardhan Arora
Shri. Vikas Annaso Bedkyale
H.B.Prabhakara Sastry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
