This order dismissed a criminal petition for anticipatory bail due to the non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel and the absence of proper representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRL.P.NO.100478/2020
BETWEEN:
SIDDALINGESH S/O CHANSANGAPPA KUDLEPPANAVAR AGED ABOUT: 40 YEARS, R/AT SHIVANAND NAGAR, KALASAPUR ROAD, NEAR ANJANAYA TEMPLE, GADAG CITY, GADAG DISTRICT-582101.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR P DAROJI & SRI. BABU PATTAR, ADV.)
AND
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY: STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, BY: DHONE TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH, HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD-580011.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.SEEMA SHIVA NAIK, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO GRANT THE ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN
2
EVENT OF THE PETITIONERS ARREST IN CRIME NO.341/2019 BY THE DHONE TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH STATE FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 420 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no representation for the
petitioner.
Office has raised objection regarding maintainability of the petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner has continuously remained absent. On 5/10/2020, this Court adjourned the case to 9/10/2020 to give one more opportunity to the petitioner. Even on 9/10/2020, there was no representation. Even today, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
Hence, petition is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
Vmb
SIDDALINGESH
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
