M/S Shriram Transport Finance Co. v. Nijagunappa Ningappa Hadimani
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal appeal under Cr.P.C. Section 378(4) set aside on settlement. Dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
Criminal appeal under Cr.P.C. Section 378(4) set aside on settlement. Dismissed as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.100144/2015
BETWEEN
M/s Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd., A Company registered under the Indian Companies Act having its Registered office at Mumbai and branch Office at 1st floor, K.L.Jain Complex, Near Old D.C.Office, Gadag, Represented by its authorized signatory and constituted attorney Sharadkumar Mohanrao Bommangi, Age about 36 years, Occ: service as Asst.Manager, R/o Gadag.
...Appellant
(By Sri. Shreevatsa S.Hegde, Advocate)
AND
Nijagunappa Ningappa Hadimani, Age: major, Occ: Business, R/o Reddernaganur, Naragund Tq., and District: Gadag
……Respondent
(By Sri. B.V.Somapur, Advocate)
2
This criminal appeal is filed under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C. seeking to set aside the judgment and order of acquittal dated 01.07.2015 passed by the I Addl.Civil Judge and JMFC-I Court, Gadag in C.C.No.541/2014 and convict the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act.
This appeal coming on for final hearing, this day, the Court, delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
When the matter is listed before the Court for dictating judgment, learned counsel for respondent has filed memo stating that matter is settled and has produced a letter issued by the appellant-company to this effect. Learned counsel for appellant admits the settlement and submitted that appellant would also file memo with the registry for reporting settlement and for withdrawing the appeal. He is permitted to file memo in the Registry.
and placing the submission of counsel for appellant on record, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/JUDGE
CLK
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.
Nijagunappa Ningappa Hadimani
Ravi V.Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court