Disposed

Sri v. K Nagaraj v Dr.H.R. Mahadev

Karnataka HC25 Nov 2020CCC/485/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka entertained a contempt petition filed by complainants alleging violation of an order dated 25th September 2019. The bench declined to entertain the petition at that stage, noting a subsequent order dated 17th November 2020, and disposed of the matter leaving open the option to file a fresh petition if the direction is not complied with.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sri v K Nagaraj Vs Dr.H.R. Mahadev — Contempt of Court | Karnataka HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON’BLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶8

C.C.C. NO.485 OF 2020 (CIVIL)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI V.K.NAGARAJ

¶11

S/O KALASAIAH

¶12

AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS

¶13

SRI.ANIL KUMAR S/O SRI V.K.NAGARAJ

¶14

AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶15

SRI.ASHOK KUMAR S/O SRI V.K.NAGARAJ

¶16

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶17

1 TO 3 ALL ARE R/AT No.1036

¶18

2^ND MAIN ROAD, M.C.LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU

¶19

SMT.A.R.LALITHA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS

¶20

D/O LATE JODIDAR

¶21

A.R.ANANTARAMAN

¶22

R/AT No.55, AYAPPA TEMPLE ROAD

¶23

CHANNAMMAKERE LAYOUT

¶24

BENGALURU – 560 028

¶25

… COMPLAINANTS

¶26

(BY SHRI V.LAKSHMINARAYANA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SHRI ASHWIN KUMAR H, ADVOCATE)

¶27

¶28

AND:

¶29

DR.H.R.MAHADEV COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BDA COMPLEX, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION BANGALORE – 560 020

¶30

… ACCUSED

¶31

¶32

THIS C.C.C. IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT AND ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR VIOLATION OF THE ORDER DATED 25^TH SEPTEMBER, 2019 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION No.20701-20704/2019 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND DIRECT THE ACCUSED TO CONDUCT SURVEY OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.

¶33

THIS C.C.C. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶34

ORDER

¶35

Perused the subsequent order dated 17^th November 2020 passed by the learned Single Judge.

¶36

In view of the said order, at this stage, we are not entertaining this contempt petition. In the event the direction contained in the order dated 17^th November 2020 is not complied with, it will be open for the complainants to file a fresh

¶37

¶38

petition alleging breach of the orders dated 25^th September 2020 and 17^th November 2020.

¶39

Subject to what is observed above, the petition is

disposed of.

Sd/CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/JUDGE

AHB

Sri v. K Nagaraj v Dr.H.R. Mahadev

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sri v. K Nagaraj v Dr.H.R. Mahadev

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S G.T.B.Enterprises Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri B Raviprakash Vs Rajendra

M/S Sree Chakra Engineering Enterprises Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Kamala Vs Jagadish

Smt M D Sumithra Devi Vs Sri Prakash G C

Smt. Bharathi S Vs Smt. S.R. Uma Shankar