Dismissed

B.Moula Sab S/O Late Hussain Sab v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC14 Oct 2019WPHC/100021/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed Article 226 writ petition praying for issuance of habeas corpus order to trace and produce missing daughter. Court notes production of marriage certificate and parties' majority status reflecting voluntary marriage. No adjudication required; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Previous directions to trace missing daughter remain; petition disposed of as nothing survives for adjudication.

B.Moula Sab S/O Late Hussain Sab Vs the State of… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Karnataka HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH

¶2

DATED THIS THE 14^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.G.M. PATIL

¶7

W.P.H.C. NO.100021 OF 2019

¶8

BETWEEN

¶9

B.MOULA SAB S/O.LATE. HUSSAIN SAB, AGE : 42 YEARS, CASTE: PINJARA, OCC : AGRICULTURIST, R/O.4^TH WARD, NEAR JAKKERABHAVI, KUDATHINI CITY, BALLARI-TQ AND DT.

¶10

....PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI.MANJUNATHA G.PATIL, ADVOCATE)

¶12

A N D

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP/BY, IT’S SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, BENGALURU-560001.

¶14

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BALLARI DISTRICT, BALLARI-583101.

¶15

THE RURAL DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BALLARI DISTRICT,

¶16

¶17

BALLARI-583101.

¶18

THE RURAL CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KURUGOD, BALLARI-583101.

¶19

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUDUTHINI POLICE STATION, KUDUTHINI, BALLARI-DISTRICT-583101.

¶20

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.G.K.HIREGOUDAR, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

¶21

THIS W.P.H.C. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, AND PRAYED THAT THE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF HABEAS CORPUS MAY KINDLY BE ISSUED BY DIRECTING THE CONCERN AUTHORITIES OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO TRACE AND PRODUCE BEFORE THIS COURT, THE MISSING DAUGHTER OF THE PETITIONER I.E., KUM.NOORJHAN D/O.MOULA SAB AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS AND THE PETITIONER IS PUT IN WITH UNTOLD MISERY AND HARDSHIPS, WHICH MADE HIS LIFE MISERABLE AND MAY KINDLY BE SYMPATHETICALLY CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT IN PROVIDING JUSTICE AND THE GRIM SITUATION IN THE FAMILY OF THE PETITIONER MAY KINDLY BE BROUGHT TO NORMALCY BY THIS COURT, BY GIVING SUITABLE DIRECTIONS TO THE AUTHORITIES CONCERN, IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶22

THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE, J, MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶23

ORDER

¶24

As per the order dated 13.09.2019, learned

¶25

Government Advocate has produced the Marriage

¶26

¶27

Certificate of the Noorjahan P. and Panduranga H. dated 11.10.2019.

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioner also fairly

¶29

submits that the parties are major and they have married each other with their own will and wish.

¶30

In view of the aforesaid submission Marriage Certificate is placed on record.

¶31

In view of the aforesaid submission nothing

¶32

survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, same is disposed of.

¶33

Sd/JUDGE

¶34

Sd/JUDGE

¶35

ckk

B.Moula Sab S/O Late Hussain Sab v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Moula Sab S/O Late Hussain Sab v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Vs the Principal Secretary

Praveen S/O Ramkrishna Nikkam, Vs Sneha W/O Praveen Nikkam

Praveen Vs Snehal

M.B. Bagoji Vs the State of Karnataka

The Secretary to Govt., Vs Smt.Kalpana L Prabu

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs M/S Hira Enterprises