Court held service of notice sufficient for most respondents and granted two weeks time for deceased respondent No. 13, failing which the writ petition would be dismissed.
Sufficient notice held; two weeks time granted for deceased respondent; failure to act will result in dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO. 3237/2017 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
…2
W.P.No.3237/2017
2
…PETITIONER/S
(BY SRI./SMT.: H.P. VEERABHADRA SWAMY ADV.)
AND:
…3
W.P.No.3237/2017
3
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, SECRETARY, TALUK VOKKALIGARA SANGHA SRI RAMA BLOCK, KRISHNARAJA NAGARA TOWN, K.R.NAGARA TALUK, MYSURU. 520001
…4
W.P.No.3237/2017
4
TALUK VOKKALIGARA SANGHA SRI RAMA BLOCK, KRISHNARAJA NAGARA TOWN, K.R.NAGARA TALUK, MYSURU. 520001
…5
W.P.No.3237/2017
5
KRISHNARAJA NAGARA TOWN, K.R.NAGARA TALUK, MYSURU. 520001
W.P.No.3237/2017
6
…7
W.P.No.3237/2017
7
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, TALUK VOKKALIGARA SANGHA SRI RAMA BLOCK, KRISHNARAJA NAGARA TOWN, K.R.NAGARA TALUK, MYSURU. 520001
…8
W.P.No.3237/2017
8
K.R.NAGARA TALUK, MYSURU. 520001
…RESPONDENT/S
(BY SRI./SMT.: M.N.MADHUSUDHAN & SUNIL KUMAR P.BANGARI ADV FOR R24 (VK FILED) RAKSHITHA D.J, ADV. FOR R3 (VK FILED) R19, 15, 14, 11, 20, 12, 17, 5 SERVED R1 TO 3 , 6, 21, 23 SERVED V/O DTD: 24/10/19 SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R8 & 9 IS HELD SUFFICIENT AND ALSO R10, 16 & 22)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATD.29.11.2016, MADE ON IA.NO.10 IN OS.NO.21/2016, ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, K.R.NAGAR, VIDE ANNEXURE-E.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER.
…9
W.P.No.3237/2017
9
ORDER
Service of notice to respondent Nos. 8 & 9 is held sufficient. Notice to respondent Nos. 10, 16 & 22 is also held sufficient. Two weeks time is granted for taking steps in respect of deceased respondent No.13, failing which, the writ petition stands dismissed on its own.
SD/JUDGE
TYPED BY : JAY CASE WORKER : SHL COMPARED BY : SHL
COPY
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. A.N. Sampath Kumar
Sri. H.R. Ningegowda
Sri.V.C. Shivaramu
Sri. A.T. Gopal
Sri. T.N. Sathyanaarayana
Sri. A.D. Manjunath
Krishna S. Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
