Petitioner in a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash Lokayukta proceedings was permitted to withdraw the petition. The high court dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANASWAMY
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
WRIT PETITION No.31680 of 2019(GM-KLA)
BETWEEN:
K.R. MURALIDHAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O LATE RAMAPPA RESIDING AT BHEEMANNA LAYOUT MARALUR DINNE TUMKUR-572 107
... PETITIONER
(By SRI SUBRAMANYA PRASAD T.N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
BEGUR VILLAGE, MARALUKUNTE POST HEBBUR HOBLI TUMKUR-572 107
... RESPONDENTS
(By SRI T.P. SRINIVAS, AGA FOR R.1 SRI VENKATESH S. ARABATTI, ADV., FOR R.2 AND 3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDERS/PROCEEDINGS/ REPORTS BEING REPORT OF R-2 UNDER SECTION 12(3) OF THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA ACT, 1984, DATED 23.02.2019 (ANNEXURE-A) IN PROCEEDINGS NO.COMPT/UPLOK/BD-2205/2015/DRE-2 AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY NARAYANASWAMY J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may
be permitted to withdraw the petition.
The said submission is placed on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
mv
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K.R. Muralidhar
State of Karnataka
The Lokayuktha
Bheemeswaraiah
L. Narayanaswamy
Ashok S. Kinagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
