A writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an impugned order was disposed of by the Chief Justice as withdrawn after the learned counsel stated that nothing survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 31455/2017 (GM-R/C) PIL
BETWEEN:
2
... PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI SANKET M. YENAGI, ADVOCATE AND SHRI GANAPATHI C.V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
3
SAVADATTI TALUK BELGUM DISTRICT-591126 REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER
4
AGE: 48 YEARS R/AT NARAYANA PETA, RAMADURGA BELGUM DISTRICT-591126
.... RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI P.B.ACHAPPA, AGA FOR R1-3; SHRI VARUN J.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R5-12; R-4 SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 01.04.2017, PASSED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNEX-F AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
5
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that nothing survives in this writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/JUDGE
SN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri C. S. Pattanashetty
Sri Raju S Nidavani
The State of Karnataka
The Karnataka Rajya Dharmika Parishat
Abhay S. Oka
H.T. Narendra Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
