C.B.Sunandamma v. the Union of India

Karnataka HC27 Aug 2019WP/24989/2017

Download

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

C.B.Sunandamma Vs the Union of India — Karnataka HC (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶73

.'E0;)3�&'(�+;-%�0-�;'B�);'1�-%.��)(.)��&;(� -��%&4.�8..'�2&��.(�;'�(;�2��;'1��B�-%.� �8:.=-;�'��;'�-.)��B��.=�6!�@�A��B�-%.��=-�� (.=,&)&-;�'�;'�-.)��B�6!��B�-%.�&=-�+&�� 2&��.(��'��5��&'(�;-�+&��208,;�%.(�;'� -%.�'.+�2&2.)��'��-%.�2.-;-;�'.)�� =�0,(�'�-�;**.(;&-.,3�B;,.(�-%.�+);-�2.-;-;�'�&�� -%.�5^-% �).�2�'(.'-�%&��&��0).(�-%&-�-%.3� +�0,(�=�'�;(.)�-%.�B�)&-;�'��B�83!2&��)�&(�� &��-&-.(�&8�4.��'�-+��)�-%)..��==&�;�'��-%.� �BB;=;&,��B)��-%.�5^-% �).�2�'(.'-�4;�;-.(�-%.� ��,&,<.).��&,0<�&'(�;'�-%��.�4;�;-��-%.��+'.)�� B�-%.�80;,(;'1�;'=,0(;'1�-%.�2.-;-;�'.)�� ).E0.�-.(� -�� =�'�;(.)� -%.;)� =&�.� B�)� =�'�-)0=-;�'��B�83!2&��)�&(��-%.��&;(��BB;=;&,�� %&4.�&��0).(�-%&-�-%.��0;-&8,.��-.2��+�0,(�8.� -&<.'� -�� =�'�;(.)� -%.� 2��;8;,;-3� �B� =�'�-)0=-;�'��B�&,-.)'&-;4.�&,;1'.'-��;'�4;.+� �B�-%.��&;(�&��0)&'=.�%.,(��0-�83�-%.� &0-%�);-;.�� -%.� 2.-;-;�'.)�� +.).� 0'(.)� ;2).��;�'�-%&-�-%.;)�).E0.�-�=�'�-)0=-;�'��B� &,-.)'&-;4.�&,;1'.'-�+�0,(�8.�&(.�&'(� -%.).B�).�-%.3�=�0,(�'�-�&22)�&=%�-%;��'H8,.� ��0)-�=%&,,.'1;'1�-%.�4&,;(;-3��B�-%.�;201'.(� '�-;B;=&-;�'��+%.'�-%.�2.-;-;�'.)��+.).��.)4.(� +;-%�&+&)(�'�-;=.�&'(�+%3�-%.3�+.).�&�<.(�-�� ).=.;4.�-%.�=�2.'�&-;�'�-%.3�=�.�-��<'�+� -%&-�-%.��0-%�);-;.��',3�-��1&;'�-;.��0=%� &��0)&'=.��&).�&(.�&'(�-%.;)�2)�2.)-;.�� +�0,(�8.�-&<.'��4.)�B�)�+;(.';'1��B�-%.�)�&(� �-.2��&).�-&<.'�-��B;,.�-%;��+);-�2.-;-;�'��-%.� 2.-;-;�'.)��%&4.�'�-�&==.2-.(�-%.�&+&)(�*&(.� 83�-%.�5^-% �).�2�'(.'-��&'(�-%.3�%&4.�'�-� ).=.;4.(�-%.�=�2.'�&-;�'��-%.�2��.��;�'��B� -%.�&=E0;).(�,&'(�+&��'�-�-&<.'�83�-%.� &0-%�);-;.��-%.�).�2�'(.'-��%&4.�'�-�-&<.'� &'3��-.2��B�)�-%.�20)2��.��B�+;(.';'1�-%.�)�&(� ;'�E0.�-;�'�&'(�-%.).B�).�-%.�;'-.).�-��B�-%.� 208,;=�+�0,(�'�-�8.�:.�2&)(;K.(�;'�-%.�.4.'-��B� -%.�+);-�2.-;-;�'�B;,.(�83�-%.�;��=�'�;(.).(�� +.4.)�;B�B�)�&'3�).&��'��-%;��'H8,.�=�0)-�

C.B.Sunandamma v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Bhagyamma Vs Bangalore Development Authority

Priyanka Industrial Training Centre Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Jawaharlal Nehru Iti Vs the State of Karnataka

Bengaluru Water Supply and Vs the State of Karnataka

C.B.Sunandamma v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Bhagyamma Vs Bangalore Development Authority

Priyanka Industrial Training Centre Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Jawaharlal Nehru Iti Vs the State of Karnataka

Bengaluru Water Supply and Vs the State of Karnataka

Hemavathi W/O Late Vs the Union of India

Smt. M. Shanthakumari Vs the Union of India