Petitioner sought writ mandamus to protect her service as AYA following a circular. During preliminary hearing, counsel requested withdrawal. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA
W.P.No.202515/2019 (S-RES)
Between:
Nagamma W/o Mahadevappa Aged about 50 years Occ: Serving as Aya in Government Higher Primary School, Lingeri R/o Lingeri, Tq. and Dist. Yadgiri
… Petitioner
(By Sri Sangoli Naganna & Sri Namdev B.S., Advocates)
And:
2
… Respondents (By Smt. Archana P. Tiwari, AGA)
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue an order/writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein not to disturb the services of the petitioner as AYA in the school of 6th respondent on the basis of circular dated 15.03.2019 issued by the 2nd respondent Annexure-C.
This petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing, this day, the Court made the following:
3
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a
memo seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the petition.
The said memo is taken on record. Accordingly,
the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
NB* Ct: RRJ
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nagamma W/o Mahadevappa
The State of Karnataka Through its Principal Secretary, Education Department
The Director, Public Instruction Department
The Director of Public Instruction, Kalaburagi
Deputy Director of Public Instruction Yadgiri
The Block Education Officer South Region Yadgiri
K.N. Phaneendra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
