The Karnataka High Court, Dhawad Bench, rejected a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 challenging a temporary injunction order. The court found no merit in the grounds as the findings by lower courts were supported by cogent reasoning.
The writ petition stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF MARCH 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
WRIT PETITION NO.110925/2014 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. DEEPAK MAGANUR, ADV. FOR SRI.CHANDRASHEKAR P PATIL, ADV.)
AND
(BY SRI.ABHISHEK PATIL, ADV. FOR SRI.M.G.NAGANURI, ADV. FOR R3 TO R5, SRI. D.L.LADKHAN, ADV. FOR R6 AND R7, R1 AND R2 SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 06.12.2012, PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL.CIVIL JUDGE, GADAG, ON I.A.NO.III FILED U/O.39 RULE 1 AND 2, IN O.S. NO. 340/2010, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-E AND THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2014 PASSED BY THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE GADAG IN M.A. NO.2/2013, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-F AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B-GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents.
Sd/JUDGE
Rsh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution ought to be allowed against the concurrent findings of the lower courts.
Whether the grounds disclosed any merit to cast a doubt on the legality of the findings by the Trial Court and the lower Appellate Court.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Davalasab S/o Moulasab Mulagund and others
The City Municipal Council Gadag and others
G.Narendar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
