The High Court of Karnataka permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one upon meeting technicalities before dismissing the current petition.
Petition dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL
WRIT PETITION NO.110504/2017 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SHRI.ABHAY KUMAR S/O BHARMGOUDA PATIL AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & SOCIAL WORK, R/AT: MALINI, HOUSE NO.25, HOUSUR BASVAN GALLI, BELAGAVI.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVIRAJ C. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN SWAMY B. HIREMATH, ADV. FOR R1; SRI. NITIN R. BOLABANDI, ADV. FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W. SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED:21.09.2017 IN P.C.R.NO.18/2012 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAUM (ANNEXURE-"A") AND CONSEQUENTLY FIR NO.7/2017 DATED:21.04.2017 BY ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU BELAGAVI CIRCLE POLICE STATION, BELAGAVI (ANNEXURE-"G") AS BEING ILLEGAL AND VOID.
: 2 :
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition by meeting out all the technicalities, which he intends to do by filing I.A.2/2019.
With liberty to file a fresh petition on the same
cause of action, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
gab
Shri. Abhay Kumar S/O Bharmgouda Patil
The Superintendent of Police Anti Corruption Bureau
Sujit S/O Madiwalappa Mulgund
B.A. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
