Petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an order. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by a single-judge bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
WRIT PETITION NO.110113/2019 (S-TR)
BETWEEN:
DR.PAVITRA D/O RAVINDRA ALUR AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC: ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, R/O: PLOT NO.269, ISHWARYAN, 3R D MAIN, KUVEMPU NAGAR, CANTONMENT, BALLARI, TQ AND DIST: BALLARI. ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.S.SANGATI, ADVOCATE)
AND
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 02.04.2019 PASSED BY THE 2N D RESPONDNET, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner files
a memo dated 20.06.2019 seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.
petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
CLK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
DR.PAVITRA
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE SRI.KRISHNADEVARAYA UNIVERSITY
S.G. PANDIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
