Petitioners approached this court via writ petitions to quash orders passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum. The court dismissed the writ petitions on the ground that they had become infructuous based on a memo filed by the counsel.
Disposal order based on memo stating petitions became infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
W.P.NO.108980/2016 (GM-CON)
& W.P.NO.109518/2016, W.P.NOS.101995-997/2017 & W.P.NOS.101998-2000/2017
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.RAMESH N.MISALE, ADV.)
AND:
2
…RESPONDENTS
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED IN COMPLAINT NO.729/2014, 730/2014, 731/2014 AND 770/2014 DATED 25.05.2016 BY THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BELAGAVI AS PER ANNEXURE-B, SO FAR AS IT PERTAINS TO FASTENING THE LIABILITY ON THE PETITIONERS AS WELL, ALONGWITH OTHER RESPONDENTS.
THESE WRIT PETITION SCOMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo dated 13.06.2019 stating that the
petitions have become infructuous and prays for dismissal.
Memo is placed on record. The writ petitions are dismissed as having become
infructuous.
SD JUDGE
MBS/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI.VENKATESH ARJUNRAO HISHOBKAR AND SMT.ROOPALI W/O DAYANAND HISHOBKAR
SRI.ROHAN CHANDRAKANT CHOUGULE
SHREE AASHRAYA SOUHARD CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.
THE SECRETARY/BRANCH MANAGER, SHREE AASHRAYA SOUHARD CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.
S.G. PANDIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
