High Court of Karnataka dismissed Writ Petition No.108585/2014 as having been rendered infructuous, based on submission that the underlying suit had been dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
WRIT PETITION NO.108585/2014 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
... PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. S. V. DESHPANDE FOR SRI. M G NAGANURI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
... RESPONDENTS
(RESPONDENTS – SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 22.08.2014 ON I.A.NO.XIV PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC ATHANI IN O.S.NO.10/2005 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the suit itself has been dismissed and hence the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
Submission of the learned counsel is placed on record.
Petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
gab
SHRI ANAND BABU HOLER @ KAMBALE
SHRI PANDAVAPPA SHIVAPPA HOLER @ KAMBALE
SHRI DURGAPPA BALAPPA HOLER @ KAMBALE
SHRI SHARNAPPA PARASAPPA KAMBALE
G. NARENDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
