Five petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitions were subsequently dismissed as withdrawn by the order of the learned judge with liberty as sought in the memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
W.P. NOS. 108543-547/2019 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
2
(BY SRI. JAGADISH PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
3
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.4 TO CALL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE IN PURSUANCE OF ANNEXURE-F, F1 AND F2 & ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners has
filed a memo praying to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions, if necessity arises.
Memo is placed on record. Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought in the memo.
SD
JUDGE
bvv
SRI RAMANAGOUDA
SOMASHEKHAR
SRI HANUMANTAPPA
SRI SHIVANAND VEERBHADRAPPA BELLARY
SMT. ANNAPOORNA
SMT. SUREKHA
S.G. PANDIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
