Writ petition challenging non-consideration of representation was dismissed on withdrawal of the petition by the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
WRIT PETITION NO.108451/2019 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.F.V.PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND:
THE TAHASILDAR, BAGALAKOTE, TQ.& DIST: BAGALAKOTE.
…RESPONDENT (BY SMT.SEEMA S NAIK, HCGP)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 17.12.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-E.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo dated 18.06.2019 seeking leave of the
Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Memo is placed on record. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Sh
SANGANAGOUDA SHANKARGOUDA JAKKANAGOUDAR
SHIVANANDA SHANKARGOUDA JAKKANAGOUDAR
SIDDANAGOUDA SHANKARGOUDA JAKKANAGOUDAR
THE TAHASILDAR, BAGALAKOTE
S.G. PANDIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
