Writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking a mandate to release an initial amount under land acquisition. The petitioners sought to withdraw the petitions, which the Court permitted, resulting in their dismissal.
Withdrawal of writ petitions permitted; petitions dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI
W.P. NOS. 107357/2018 & 107358/2018 (LA-RES)
BETWEEN:
(BY SRI. LAXMAN T. MANTAGANI, ADVOCATE)
AND
2
(BY SRI. RAVI V. HOSAMANI, A.G.A)
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO RELEASE THE INITIAL AMOUNT AS PER THE REQUEST MADE BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-C & ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
In the instant petitions, learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing the matter for some time seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petitions. Accordingly, the writ petitions stand dismissed as
withdrawn.
SD JUDGE
bvv
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bheemangouda S/O Basappa
Subashchandraboise
The Secretary, Government of Karnataka
Chief Secretary, Finance Department
P.B.Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
