Petitioner withdrew the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and Section 482 CrPC challenging a maintenance order, stating the respondent had expired, leading to dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL
WRIT PETITION NO.104761 OF 2018(GM-FC)
BETWEEN
SRI. VEERESH S/O. SHARABHALINGAPPA HULLATTI AGE:39 YRS, OCC:CORPORATE APPLICATIONS ENGINEER, R/O. #55, BASAVESHWAR NAGAR, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.VISHWANATH S. BICHAGATTI, ADV.) AND
SMT. JYOTI D/O. GURUPADAPPA SHIRAMOAGOND AFTER MARRIAGE CALLED JYOTI W/O. VEERESH HULLATTI, AGE:36 YEARS, OCC:NIL, R/O. %168, CENTRAL EXCISE COLONY, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. VINOD S. PAWAR, ADV.)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SEC.482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED:11.05.2018 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 FILED U/S. 125(1) OF CR.P.C. IN CRL.MISC.NO.120/2017 ON THE FILE OF HON'BLE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, HUBBALLI VIDE ANNEXUER-E.
: 2 :
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a
memo to withdraw the petition as the respondent has expired on 15.12.2018 and petition does not survive for consideration. The said memo is taken on record and petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Hmb
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri. Veeresh S/o. Sharabhalingappa Hullatti
Smt. Jyoti D/o. Gurupadappa Shiramoagond
B.A.Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
