A writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying for disqualification of the sixth respondent from Taluk Panchayat membership was dismissed as withdrawn by the sanction of counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
WRIT PETITION No.103763/2019 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI.D.F.BABU SAB S/O FAKKURASAB, AGED ABOUT: 46 YEARS, OCC: MEMBER, KRISHNA NAGAR, GRAMA PANCHAYAT, SANDUR, R/O: KRISHNANAGAR, TQ: SANDUR, DIST: BALLARI. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI B.SHARANABASAWA, ADVOCATE)
A N D :
(BY SRI A.R.RODRIGUES, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 5, TO PASS AN ORDER OF DISQUALIFICATION DISQUALIFYING THE 6TH RESPONDENT FROM HIS MEMBERSHIP OF TALUK PANCHYAT, SANDUR, ELECTED FROM NO.8, KRISHNA NAGAR, CONSTITUENCY OF SANDUR TALUK AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the
petition be dismissed as withdrawn.
The said submission of the learned counsel is
placed on record.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sd/-)
JUDGE
jm/-
Sri.D.F.Babu Sab
The State of Karnataka
Banadar Subansab
G.Narendar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
