A writ petition arising from a civil suit was dismissed as infructuous after the petitioner filed a memo withdrawing the petition on the ground that the underlying civil suit had been decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
W.P. NO.102692/2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN
ASHPAK KARADGIKAR S/O ADAMSAB KARADGIKAR AGED ABOUT: 44 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: ADBARGALLI, TALUK: YELLAPUR, UTTARA KANNADA-581359.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B HIREMATH, ADV.)
AND
SMT.AYISHA KARADGIKAR W/O ASHPAK KARADGIKAR OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: AKBARGALLI, TALUK YELLAPUR UTTARA KANNADA-581359.
... RESPONDENT
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 27.02.2018 AT ANNEXURE – E PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YELLAPUR IN O.S.NO.88/2014 AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW I.A.NO.15.
THIS WP COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
: 2 :
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition on the ground that the civil suit itself has been decided.
Aforesaid memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Rsh
Ashpak Karadgikar
Ayisha Karadgikar
Alok Aradh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
