The High Court of Karnataka disposed of two writ petitions as infructuous since the underlying family dispute proceedings had been compromised and settled prior to the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
WRIT PETITION NO.102453/2015 (GM-CPC) & WRIT PETITION NO.102524/2015
BETWEEN:
LEELAVATI RAMACHANDRA HEGDE, AGE:59 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD, R/O:GADIHALLI, TQ: SIRSI, DIST:UTTARAKANNADA.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. V G BHAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ANANT HEGDE, ADV. FOR R2; R2 & R3 - SERVED)
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SIRSI ON IA NO.1 DTD.11/02/2010 VIDE ANNEXURE-F1 AND ORDER PASSED ON IA NO.4 IN FDP 6/02 BY SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SIRSI DATED 12.01.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-F2 AND ALLOW THE IA NO.4 IN FDP 6/02 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SIRSI
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Both the counsels submit that the matter has been compromised and the FDP proceedings has been disposed off way back on 01.08.2015.
Hence the petitions are disposed off as having been rendered infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
gab
LEELAVATI RAMACHANDRA HEGDE
SHANKAR NARAYAN GANAPATI HEGDE
GEETHA W/O SHANKARANARAYAN HEGDE
GIRIJA D/O SHANKARANARAYAN HEGDE
G. NARENDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
