Sri Chandrappa v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a handwritten order granting six weeks to the unrepresented appellant to rectify office objections. If compliance is not made, the appeal stands dismissed; otherwise, it is listed for further hearing.
What did the court decide?
Time of six weeks granted to rectify office objections; appeal to be dismissed if not complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.ABHAY S.OKA CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
WRIT APPEAL NO. 3896/2019 (GM -R/C)
BETWEEN
SRI.CHANDRAPPA
SON OF RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT THIGALARA PETE,
ANEKAL TOWN, BENGALURU DISTRICT-562102
... APPELLANT/S
(BY SRI./SMT.: FAYAZ SAB B G, ADVOCATE)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant, unrepresented, should be granted time to rectify office objections to the appealed order.
Whether the appeal should be dismissed if procedural compliance is not made within the stipulated time.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SRI. CHANDRAPPA
- respondent
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
- respondent
SRI A. RAMESH
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WA/3896/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court