Disposed

Smt. Dhanalakshmi Raju v. the Commissioner

Karnataka HC7 Aug 2019WA/1684/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a writ appeal filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act challenging a BBMP order. The court dismissed the appeal by granting a four-week time limit to the respondents to rectify office objections, warning of dismissal for non-prosecution if failed.

What did the court decide?

Four weeks time granted to rectify objections; appeal will be dismissed for non-prosecution if objection remains unrectified.

Smt. Dhanalakshmi Raju Vs the Commissioner — Property and Title | Karnataka HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶2

DATED THIS THE 07^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR. ABHAY S.OKA CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ

¶7

WRIT APPEAL NO. 1684/2019 (LB-BMP)

¶8

BETWEEN

¶9

SMT. DHANALAKSHMI RAJU W/O LATE M.S. RAJU AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS R/O NO.55, DICKENSON ROAD, BENGALURU 560043.

¶10

... APPELLANT/S

¶11

(BY SRI./SMT.: M.S.MOHAN AND N.SREENIVASA MURTHY, ADVOCATES)

¶12

AND:

¶13

1 . THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BENGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE HUDSON CIRCLE BENGALURU 1.

¶14

2 . THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (EAST) BRUHATH BANGLAORE MAHANGARA PALIKE

¶15

W.A.NO.1684/2019

¶16

¶17

EAST RANGE MAYOHALL, BENGALURU 1.

¶18

3 . THE REVENUE OFFICER BRUHAT BANGLAORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU 560001.

¶19

4 . THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER BRUHAT BANGLAORE MAHANGARA PALIKE HEBBAL SUB-DIVSIION BENGALURU .

¶20

5 . SMT. DASHARATH RANI W/O N. NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO.5, 6TH "A" CROSS MANORAYANAPALYA R.T. NAGAR POST BENGALURU 560032.

¶21

6 . SMT. V.M. SUSHEELA W/O D.R. VENKATESHMURTHY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT #26, 6TH A CROSS, MANORAYANAPALYA R.T. NAGAR POST BENGALURU 560 032.

¶22

7 . SMT. USHA NARAYANAN W/O R. DESIKAN AGED ABOUT 50 LYEARS R/AT NO.1, 6T1TH "A" CROSS MANORAYANAPALYA R.T. NAGAR LPOST BENGALURU 560032.

¶23

8 . SRI. A.SHWATHANARAYANA SETTY S/O ADISHESHAIAH SETTEE AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS

¶24

W.A.NO.1684/2019

¶25

¶26

R/AT NO.240 MANORAYANAPALYA R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU 560 032.

¶27

9 . NANJAMMA W/O M. GOPALAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO.73, 6TH "A" CROSS, MANORAYANAPALYA R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU 560 032.

¶28

10 . SRI. VINCENT KANTHARAJ S/O LATE M. SANTOSH RAJ AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/AT NO.9, 6TH "A" CROSS MANORAYANAPALYA R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU 560 032.

¶29

11 . SRI. C. KRISHNAPPA @ KRISHNA S/O CHIKKANNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT OLD NO.23, NEW NO.4 6TH "A" CROSS MANORAYANAPALYA R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU 560 032.

¶30

12 . S.R. LAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT #40, 6TH A CROSS MANORAYANAPALYA R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU 560 032.

¶31

13 . SRI.T.N. SASANKAN AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS

¶32

W.A.NO.1684/2019

¶33

¶34

S/O T. NARAYAN R/AT NO.7, 6TH "A" CROS, MANORAYANAPALYA R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU 560 032.

¶35

14 . SRI. CHALLAM SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS,

¶36

(A) SMT.MADHAVI W/O LATE CHALLAM AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

¶37

(B) SRI.BINU K.C S/O LATE CHALLAM AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

¶38

¶39

(D) SMT. BEENA K C D/O LATE CHALLAM AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

¶40

ALL R/AT #21, MADHAVI NILAYAM, TULASAMMA LAYOUT, MANORAYANAPALYA R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU 560 032.

¶41

SRI NAGENDRA A RAO AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O A.ANANDA RAO R/AT NO.15, L6TH "A" CROSS MANORAYANAPALYA R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU 560 032.

…RESPONDENT/S

W.A.NO.1684/2019

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO (A) ISSUE AN ORDER OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS OF THE SINGLE BENCH IMPUNGED ORDER OF ANNEXURES-M AND N DATED:24.07.2018, AND ALSO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.4 TO IMPLEMENT THE IMPUGNED ORDERS PASSED BY THE R-2 DATED 05/10/2007 ANNEXURE-H AND CANCEL THE KHATHA IN RESPECT OF R-5 TO R-14; (B) CALL FOR RECORDS OF THIS APPELLANT AND ALSO THE RECORDS OF R5 TO R14 IN RESPECT OF 34 GUNTAS OF PROPERTY IN SURVEY NO.46/4 AND 46/6 SITUATED AT MANORAYANAPALYA, CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 2^ND RESPONDENT OF BBMP; (C) TO ISSUE/ PASS ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDER OR DIRECTION, AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER TO GRANT ORDERS ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE WITH EXEMPLARY COST ON RESPONDENTS AND ALLOW THIS WRIT APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶46

THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER.

W.A.NO.1684/2019

ORDER

Time of four weeks is granted to rectify the office objections failing

¶51

which, the appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court.

¶52

Sd/CHIEF JUSTICE

¶53

Sd/JUDGE

¶54

TYPED BY : SK CASE WORKER : SMV COMPARED BY : SMV

¶55

COPY Sd/-

¶56

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Smt. Dhanalakshmi Raju v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Dhanalakshmi Raju v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ms Kavita Jain Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Pradeep Eashwar Vs the State of Karnataka

Madhan Mohan S Vs Government of Karnataka

Mr Padmanabh Shankar Vs Union of India

Mohammed Ashraf Vs the Director of Agricultural Marketing

R Satish Vs the Senior Geologist