Appellants filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a judgment in an underlying writ petition. The Court, served with a memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal, dismissed the writ appeal as withdrawn.
The writ appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.G.M. PATIL
WRIT APPEAL NO.100426 OF 2019 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN
2
SHOP NO.4, KUMTA, AGE: 49 YRS, OCC: BUSINESS, TQ: KUMTA, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. D. J. NAIK, ADVOCATE)
AND
... RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND SET ASIDE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER DATED 04.06.2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.101316/2017 (LB) AND GRANT ALL THE PRAYERS AS PRAYED FOR BY THE APPELLANT IN THE WRIT PETITION NO.101316/2017 (LB), IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE, J, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
Learned counsel for appellants has filed a memo
seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
Memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
yan
1 provisions across 1 enactments
CHANDRASHEKAR SRIDHAR NAIK
SHOBA W/O RAJU BALEGAR
MOHAMED SHAFI ABDUL RAVUF SHAIKH
NARAYAN VENKATRAMAN NAIK
GANAPATHI PARMESWAR SHET
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
ALOK ARADHE
P.G.M. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
