Dismissed
Monta Moolya v. Sundari
Karnataka HCRSA/111/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A regular second appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC was dismissed for default as the appellants failed to comply with earlier court directions and office objections.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed for default.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
- 1 -
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
¶3
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019
¶4
BEFORE
¶5
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD
¶6
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 111 OF 2018
¶7
BETWEEN:
¶8
- MONTA MOOLYA SON OF LOKU MOOLYA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KELAGINA PADTHARE GARGADY VILLAGE PANJINADAI POST BELTHANGADY TALUK, D. K. DISTRICT.
¶9
- KRISHNAPPA
¶10
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, SON OF LOKU MOOLYA RESIDENT OF KELAGINA PADTHARE GARGADY VILLAGE PANJINADAI POST BELTHANGADY TALUK D. K. DISTRICT.
¶11
... APPELLANTS
¶12
(BY SRI. K RAVISHANKAR., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Monta Molya
- appellant
Krishnappa
- respondent
Sundari
- respondent
Girija
- respondent
Appi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/111/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court