The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, adjourned an appeal for six weeks to comply with office objections. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to comply with the objections.
The appeal RFA No. 100200/2018 stands dismissed due to non-compliance with office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD
DATED THIS 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI
RFA NO 100200 OF 2018 [PARTN]
BETWEEN
SMT. SUNANDA JW/O JAGADISHGOUDA PATIL AG:56 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD & AGRICULTURE, R/O:KHANAPUR VILLAGE, TQ:NARAGUND, DIST:GADAG ... APPELLANT
(By Sri B. T. KULKARNI, ADV.)
AND
1.SHRI. VENKAREDDY @ VENKAPPA A/F YALLAREDDY NEELAREDDY AGE:62 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O: KURUGOVINAKOPPA VILLAGE, TQ:NARAGUND, DIST:GADAG
2.SHRI VITTAL S/O VENKAPPA NEELAREDDY AGE:32 YEARS, OCC:TEACHER IN SIDDESHWAR COLLEGE, NARAGUND, R/O:KURUGOVINAKOPPA VILLAGE, TQ:NARAGUND, DIST:GADAG
3.SHRI MANJUNATH S/O VENKAPPA NEELAREDDY AGE:30 YEARS, OCC:MILTARY SERVICE, AHMEDNAGAR, MAHARSTRA STATE, R/O:KURUGOVINAKOPPA VILLAGE, TQ:NARAGUND, DIST:GADAG
4.SMT.ANASUYA W/O FAKKIRAGOUDA KAGADAL, AGE:ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD, R/O:KHANAPUR VILLAGE,
2
TQ:NARAGUND, DIST:GADAG
5.SHRI BASAVARAJ S/O GADIGEPPA PATTANSHETTI AGE:MAJOR, OCC:AGRICULTURE,
R/O:SUREBAN, TQ:RAMADURG, DIST:BELAGAVI
... RESPONDENTS
This Regular First Appeal filed under order 41 rule 1 of CPC, against the judgment and decree dtd: 09.02.2018 passed in O.S. No. 219/2014 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadag, partly decreeing the suit filed for declaration, partition and separate possession.
This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following;
O R D E R
Finally six weeks’ time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the case would be dismissed for non-compliance of office objections without reference to the Court.
SD/JUDGE
//COPY//
Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 09.10.2019, the Advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this RFA No. 100200/2018 stands dismissed as per the Court Order dated 13.02.2019.
SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR .
R- By:C- By:T- By: -svp.
SMT. SUNANDA JW/O JAGADISHGOUDA PATIL
SHRI. VENKAREDDY @ VENKAPPA
SHRI VITTAL S/O VENKAPPA NEELAREDDY
SHRI MANJUNATH S/O VENKAPPA NEELAREDDY
SMT.ANASUYA W/O FAKKIRAGOUDA KAGADAL
SHRI BASAVARAJ S/O GADIGEPPA PATTANSHETTI
P.B. BAJANTHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
