The High Court granted a final week of time to remove office objections. When such objections were not complied with, the Miscellaneous First Appeal was dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Appeal dismissed due to failure to remove office objections within granted time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8639 OF 2017
BETWEEN
G. GANASHREE W/O M.C. RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT RAJ BUILDING ASHOKA ROAD, 32ND EAST CROSS BEHIND KALYAN JEWELIERS LASHKAR MOHALL, MYSORE-570009.
...APPELLANT
(By Sri. N.R. GIRISHA, SURENDRA.R, Advocates)
AND:
M.C. RAMESH S/O CHAMUNDI AGED 38 YEARS TAVAREKEKATTE CHAMUNDI HILL MAIN ROAD MYSORE-570009.
... RESPONDENT
2
MFA.No.8639/17
This MFA filed U/S 19(1) of Family Court Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.01.2017 passed in MC No.201/2013 on the file of the Judge, Prl. I Addl. Family Court, Mysuru.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
The matter is listed for removal of office objections for the fifth time.
Once again, time is prayed for to remove office objections.
In the interest of justice, finally, a week’s time is granted to remove office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
3
MFA.No.8639/17
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt.18.09.2019 the Office Objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
T By: RM COPY R By: DS C By: MP
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
G. GANASHREE
M.C. RAMESH
B.V. NAGARATHNA
ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
