The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1(a) CPC after the appellant withdrew the appeal, resulting in the disposal of a pending application.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7947 OF 2016 (CPC)
BETWEEN: DR.HOTTI CHANDRASHEKAR S/O.LATE HALAKATEPPA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS RETD. DIRECTOR DRAUGHT MONITORY CELL R/AT ‘SANGAM’ MIG-77 6TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN KHB COLONY, II STAGE BASAVESHWARA NAGAR BENGALURU-560 079 ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI HARISH N. FOR SRI ASHOK B. PATIL, ADVOCATES)
AND:
NEAR CRAFT HALL RAICHUR-584 101
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(a) OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 22.10.2016 PASSED BY THE COURT OF VIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN OS.NO.470/2011 AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri Harish N., learned counsel appearing on
behalf of Sri Ashok B. Patil, learned counsel for the appellant.
Today, a memo is filed by the learned counsel for the
appellant for withdrawal of the appeal.
The memo is taken on record.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application does not survive and the same is
accordingly disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
LB
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Hotti Chandrashekar
Raichur District Kannada Sahitya Parishat
Sri Ayyappa Tukkaï
Sri Veera Hanuman
Sri Ranganna Patil
Pradeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
