Dismissed
Deekahsa Bai v. Kumara
Karnataka HCMFA/5769/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5769 OF 2018
APPELLANT
DEEKAHSA BAI, D/O MANJOJI RAO, AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS, SINCE MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER – NATURAL GUARDIAN H. MANJOJI RAO, S/O LATE HANUMANTHA RAO, R/O THATTEHALLI VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK , SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT.
(BY SRI. M. MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE)
-V/S-
RESPONDENTS
2
MFA No.5769/18
MAJOR, OWNER OF BIKE NO. KA-14/EJ-6821, R/O THATTEHALLI VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT against the Judgment and Award dated 09.02.2018 passed in MVC No.438/2016 on the file of the PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, ADDITIONAL MACT-11, BHADRAVATHI, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
Three weeks time is granted finally to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed on its own.
Sd/JUDGE
MFA No.5769/18 3 -----------------------
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt.06.09.2019, Office objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
T By: DS R By: DS COPY C By: TS Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Deekahsa Bai, represented by H. Manjogi Rao
Kumara s/o Hucharayappa
Smt. Prema K.
National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Krishna S. Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court