Smt Madduramma v. Smt Huchalakshmamma
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC against an order dismissing an application in a civil suit. The judgment text following the operative part is unreadable due to corruption.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
M.F.A. NO.4222 OF 2017 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. MADDURAMMA W/O. LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT. NO.88/1, 14TH CROSS 4TH BLOCK, NEAR GANESHA TEMPLE PEENYA, BENGALURU – 560 058
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI PRASANNA V.R, ADVOCATE)
AND:
- SMT. HUCHALAKSHMAMMA
- W/O. LATE DODDA MUNIYAPPA
- AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT. NO.90, 14TH CROSS NEAR GANESHA TEMPLE
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the appeal against the order dismissing I.A. No.3 in O.S. No.7018/2016.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Madduramma w/o. Late Muniyappa
- respondent
1. Smt. Huchalakshmamma w/o. Late Doddamuniyappa
- respondent
2. Smt. Mariyamma w/o. Sri Muthappa
- respondent
3. Smt. Muniyamma w/o. Late Chikka Hanumanthappa
- respondent
4. Smt. Karagamma w/o. M. Muniyappa
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/4222/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court