Shri Durga Canteen v. the Asst. Director
Case brief
What is this about?
An appeal was dismissed because the sole appellant, K. Sundar Shetty, filed a memo stating he had died and would not press the appeal before the High Court of Karnataka.
An appeal was dismissed because the sole appellant, K. Sundar Shetty, filed a memo stating he had died and would not press the appeal before the High Court of Karnataka.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
MFA No.23930/2009 (ESI)
Between:
Shri Durga Canteen, Old Bus Stand, Hubli, Rep. by its partner, K. Sundar Shetty, Age 56 years, Occ: Business, R/o.:Aravindnagar, Karwar Road, Hubli.
… Appellant
(By Shri Shrikant T.Patil, Advocate)
And:
… Respondents
(By Shri V.M.Sheelvant, Advocate for R1 & R2)
This MFA is filed under Section 82(2) of the Employee’s State Insurance Act, 1948, against the order
dated 29.09.2009, passed in ESI No.35/2005 on the file of the Employee’s State Insurance Court, Hubli, rejecting the application filed by the applicant under Section 75 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.
This appeal coming on for final hearing, this day, the Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
dated 16.10.2019 and submits that he would not press
the appeal since the sole appellant has died.
Memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the appeal is
dismissed as not pressed.
SD/JUDGE
Vnp*
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shri Durga Canteen
The Asst. Director, Sub-Regional Office, ESI, Corporation, Keshwapur, Hubli
The Recovery Officer, Sub-Regional Office, ESI, Corporation, Keshwapur, Hubli
H.T. Narendra Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court