The Karnataka High Court dismissed the first miscellaneous appeal filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as the appellant sought and was granted permission to withdraw the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to present it before the competent District Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17th DAY OF OCTOBER 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.101666 of 2018 (LAC)
BETWEEN
KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KNNL, CANAL DIVISION DN-6, BALLARI-583101. ... APPELLANT
(By Sri. RAMESH N. MISALE, ADV.)
AND
... RESPONDENTS
(By Sri. R. RAVINDRA NAIK, HCGP FOR R1.)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 26.3.2015 PASSED IN LAC NO.48 OF 2011 ON
2
THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BALLARI, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.10,00,000/- PER ACRE.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned Government Pleader is directed to take notice for respondent No.1.
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
dated 17.10.2019 seeking permission to withdraw the
appeal with liberty to present it before the competent District Court.
The memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
with liberty to present it before the competent District Court.
sd/-
JUDGE
Kmv
1 provisions across 1 enactments
KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD
THE ASST. COMMISIONER CUM SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER YETHA NIRAVARI YOJANA, BALLARI
A VEERABHADRA ALIAS VEERABHADRA GOUDA
H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
