Appeal filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant because he opted for the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
C.E.A.NO.42/2018
BETWEEN:
SHRI. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY PROPRIETOR OF M/S BALAJI ENTERPRISES RAMAKRISHNA TOWER NO.31/2, HOSUR ROAD BANGALORE - 560 068.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. PRADYUMNA G.H, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 35G, OF THE CENTRAL EXCISE ACT,1944, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE FINAL ORDER NO.21153/2017 DATED:26.07.2017 (ANNEXURE-E) PASSED BY THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, (CESTAT’S), BANGALORE AND ETC.
2
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ARAVIND KUMAR J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel appearing for appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of present appeal on the ground that appellant has opted for Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. Said memo is placed on record. In view of the same, appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn for the reasons indicated in the memo.
SD/JUDGE
SD/JUDGE
DR
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Ramakrishna Reddy, Proprietor of M/s Balaji Enterprises
The Commissioner of Central Tax, Bangalore South Commissionerate
The Joint Commissioner of Central Tax, South Commissionerate
Aravind Kumar
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
