In a contempt petition for non-implementation of a previous order, the High Court of Karnataka closed the petition reserving liberty to revive it if necessary, citing a stay order in a pending writ appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
C.C.C.NO.1309 OF 2019 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
W.NINGAPPA, S/O MALAPPA WAGGAR, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.1378, 10TH MAIN ROAD, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 040. …COMPLAINANT
(BY SMT.M.L.SUVARNA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI M.NAGAPRASANNA ASSOCIATES)
AND:
N.LAKSHMINARAYANA, GENERAL MANAGER (PERSONNEL) CANARA BANK, CIRCLE OFFICE, NO.86, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001. ...ACCUSED
(BY SRI T.P.MUTHANNA , ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY THE COMPLAINANT PRAYING TO INITIATE ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR CONTEMPT OF THIS HON’BLE COURT IS NOT IMPLEMENTING THE ORDER DATED 02.04.2019 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.29870/2014.
2
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, NAGARATHNA J., THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the complainant submits
that as against the order in respect of which compliance has been sought in this contempt petition, writ appeal has been filed by the respondent-bank and there is an order of stay granted by the Division Bench of this Court till 04.11.2019.
that there is a likelihood of the interim stay being continued.
petition is closed reserving liberty to the complainant to revive this contempt petition in case of necessity.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
BSR
B.V.Nagarathna
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
