This contempt petition was dismissed as withdrawn following a memo filed by the learned counsel for the complainant.
Contempt petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.G.M. PATIL CCC NO.100072/2019 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN
SRI.MARUTI S/O MONAPPA LAD AGED ABOUT: 65 YEARS, R/AT: NO.215/A, ANANDWADI, SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI.
... COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. MRUTYUNJAY TATA BANGI, ADV.)
AND
... ACCUSED
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING THIS HON’BLE COURT TO INITIATE, TRY AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED PERSONS FOR WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE TO THE ORDERS PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN MSA NO.690/2013 DATED ---- COPY AS PER ANNEXURE --- , IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
2
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the complainant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the contempt petition.
Said memo is taken on record. Accordingly, contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/JUDGE
SD/JUDGE
Rsh
N.M. Peerzade and Pushpa Martanad Malhar
Allok Aradhe
P.G.M. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
