Disposed

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation v. M. Raja

Karnataka HC5 Sept 2018WP/65746/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Joint Memorandum recorded by a Lok Adalat settling a labor dispute involving reinstatement of a workman with continuity of service for terminal benefits only, excluding other benefits like backwages, pursuant to an interim order.

What did the court decide?

Settlement: Workman to be reinstated with continuity of service for terminal benefits only; no backwages or other benefits.

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Karnataka HC (2018)

��

��

��^��

��

�� !�

��

�� !��"��

#��

��$%� �� &�� $�%'(�$ ��$(�$� )�%� ��+�%�,�$�+�-).)')�%� ��/��#0)��)%,�� /1'�$&��� #�%,��$&�2��� #1�) '�-).)')�%��% $��&$� �&(��31�) '��!)&4��5��44)6&$��

¶11

�#1��+ ��&%0��7��*��.�6� &��

¶12

��-

¶13

/��8��/�$�((�� �,&��3�0 ��"�1&�$'� �� &5��� �^' ��$�''��^' �/�)%�� 9)%�1��,�$� #�%,��$&�2��:�� -��

¶14

�#1��$)��!&��$*��.�6� &��

¶15

¶16

�7��;��-�<��=��;��7��<��;� ��-��>��?��@<��7��7��/�<?��-��-�-��-� ��-�#>��7��;��--��#�<��<�� #��?��-��"��:�9�-��A<��B��

¶17

�7��/��?��;�� #�;��-��;��#��?��;��-�#>��7��<��*� �7��;��?��-��-��

¶18

��

¶19

�!)'�5$) �(& ) )�%�)'�4)�&��6!��&%,)%,� !&��5�$��(�''&��31� !&�;)$' �

¶20

��) )�%��3�0$��0$ �#�%,��$&�� &��)%��-��"��:�� .)�&��%%&C0$&�B�D��

¶21

�� 4 &$�%&,� )� )�%'*� !&�(�$ )&'�!�.&��$$).&�� '& �&+&% ��66�$�)%,� �� !&�'& �&+&% � !&�(& ) )�%&$�2� �� !�'��,$&&�� $&)%' � &� !&� $&'(�%�&% �2�5�$�+�%�)% ��'&$.)6&�5) !�6�% )%0) 1��4�'&$.)6&��%�1�4�$� !&� (0$(�'&��4� &$+)%��3&%&4) '��%��!&�)'�%� �&% ) �&��4�$��%1��)%�� !&$�3&%&4) '� 4$�+� !&�� &��4��)'+)''�� )�� !&�� &��4�$&)%' � &+&% �(0$'0�% � �� !&��% &$)+� �$�&$�)%�40��%��4)%��'& �&+&% ��4�6��)+��4� !&�$&'(�%�&% ��2�5�$�+�%��%�� !&�$&'(�%�&% �2�5�$�+�%�!�'��,$&&�� !&�'�+&�)%� !&��3�.&� &$+'��E�)% � /&+��)'�4)�&��%�3&!��4��4� !&�(�$ )&'� �� !)'�&44&6 ��

¶22

¶23

:�� 66�$�)%,�1*� !)'��$) ��& ) )�%�4)�&��31� !&��$(�$� )�%�)'��)'(�'&��4� +��)41)%,� !&��5�$�� &��(�''&��31� !&�;)$' ��) )�%��3�0$�

¶24

��0$ *�#�%,��$&�)%��-��"��:�.)�&��%%&C0$&�B�D��

�"#$�

��

�"#$�

��

�3.F�

FILED BEFORE LOK ADALAT

¶32

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE HIGH COURT LOK ADALAT

¶33

W.P. NO. 65746/2016

¶34

(LOK ADALATH NO. 6797/2017)

¶35

BETWEEN: KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION.

¶36

... Petitioner/s

¶37

AND:

¶38

M. Raja ... Respondent/s

¶39

JOINT MEMO

¶40

This Writ Petition is filed challenging the award of the First Additional Labour Court, Bangalore, dated 27/01/2016 in I.D. No.9/2013 vide Annexure ‘P’. The Writ Petition has been referred to this Lok Adalat by the Hon'ble High Court U/S.20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act.1987. The parties to the petition have settled their claim before the Lok Adalat on the following terms:

¶41

The Petitioner – Corporation and respondent – workman have agreed that Respondent – Workman to be reinstated into service with continuity of service only for the purpose of terminal benefits and he is not entitled for any other benefits including backwages from the date of dismissal till the date of reinstatement pursuant to the Interim Order.

¶42

The parties to this petition have set their hands to this settlement before the Lok Adalat in the presence of Conciliators on this 05.09.2018 at Bengaluru Bench.

¶43

Sd/-

¶44

SIGNATURE OF PETITIONER SIGNATURE OF RESPONDENT/S

¶45

ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT/S

¶46

Sd/Sd/-

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation v. M. Raja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation v. M. Raja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Rajappa Vs Mariswamy

Ramakrishnappa Vs Venkatesh S B

Omkaramma Vs Abdul Razak

Smt Manjula L Vs the Managing Director

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs Sri. Dastagir Sab

Mrs. Kumada Valli Vs Mr.Suresh Rolli