High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition seeking to quash an interim order allowing impleadment as infructuous.
The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH
ON THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2018
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
WRIT PETITION NO.200193 OF 2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
GANGADEVI W/O HANMANTHRAO PATIL AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD R/O C/O G. PRABHAKAR, PLOT NO.34 GANESH NAGAR, RING ROAD SEDAM ROAD, KALABURAGI (BY B.D. HANGARKI, ADVOCATE )
... PETITIONER
AND:
2
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K.M. GAHTE, AGA FOR R4 AND R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KALABURAGI IN LAC NO.82 OF 2014 DATED 13.12.2017 ON I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER I R 10 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D, AND THEREBY CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW SAID I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER I RULE 10 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, BY PERMITTING THE PETITIONER TO BE IMPLEADED AS PETITIONER NO.3.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petition has become infructuous. In view of the submission,
the petition is dismissed as having become infrcutuous.
Sd/JUDGE
BL Ct:RRJ
Gangadevi W/o Hanmanthrao Patil
Malleshappa S/o Shivasharanappa Agasatheerth
Nagabhushana S/o Shivasharanappa Agasatheerth
Executive Engineer Karnataka Urban Water Supply & Drainage Board, Gulbarga Division
The Deputy Commissioner Gulbarga
Office of the Assistant Commissioner & Land Acquisition Officer Gulbarga
Ravi Malimath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
