Shri Jaikumar Appanna Khemlapure v. Shri Vasant Yamanappa Janaj
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS…
COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2018
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT WP NO. 110208 OF 2017 (SC/ST)
BETWEEN:
SHRI JAIKUMAR APPANNA KHEMLAPURE AGE:52 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O:SAVADATTI, TAL:RAIBAG, DIST:BELAGAVI.
... PETITIONER
(By Sri.. RAVIRAJ C PATIL, ADV.)
AND:
2
... RESPONDENTS
BELAGAVI.
This writ petition filed under article 226 and 227 of the constitution of India, praying to Quash the portion of the order dated:16.02.2017 in so far it relates to directing the Assistant Commissioner Chikkodi to cancel the mutation entry and also the finding that the petitioner has purchased the property from the persons who are not the owners of the property. Passed in RB/PTCL/AP-30/2015-16 as per Annexure-C.
This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court, delivered the following;
O R D E R
Finally four weeks’ time is granted to compliance of the office objection/s. If not complied, the petition stands dismissed without reference to the Bench.
SD/JUDGE.
As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 14/06/2018 , the Advocate for the Petitioner has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this WP No.110208/2017 stands dismissed, as per the Court Order dated 16/04/2018.
BY ORDER
SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By :- svp R By:C By:-
Shri Jaikumar Appanna Khemlapure
Shri Vasant Yamanappa Janaj
Shri Appasaheb Bandu Janaj
The Tahsildar Raibag Taluk
The Assistant Commissioner Chikkodi
The Deputy Commissioner
Krishna S. Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court