This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging an impugned order was dismissed as infructuous by the High Court of Karnataka as the AGA filed a memo stating the petition had become infructuous in view of the operative portion of the impugned order.
The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION NO.105354/2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.M.KUMAR, AGA)
AND:
2
...RESPONDENTS
3
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARWAD SITTING AT HUBBALLI IN MISC.APPEAL NO.3/2018 ON 21.07.2018 (ANENXURE-F).
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned AGA has filed a memo stating that the writ petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous in view of the operative portion of the impugned order.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having
become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Sh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Karnataka
Jeeendra Khadam
Shashikalabai Khadam
Subhash Khadam
Sadanand Khadam
Vivekanand Khadam
S. Sunil Dutt Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
