Shri Babu Sapaliga v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC12 Jan 2018WA/4311/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The judgment text is unintelligible, consisting of non-text symbols, garbled characters, and fallback glyphs. No substantive legal content, parties, or reasoning is available for extraction.

What the court decided

AI extract

Shri Babu Sapaliga Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶58

F�!��15��.+��9118�/864�3<513��82:�6��=+5/2/6+61� 6.��1�@.��.+3�8�6�+002/13�/8�)�4>��6.�<7.�186/6213� =�4�74+86��=��55<0+85:�4/7.6��2+/>�<8314��15��/8� )�4>��/��014>/��/921��82:�/8�41�0156��=�6.1�2+83� @./5.�.+��D1�613�/8�6.1��6+61��D148>186�9:�D/46<1��=� �15��=�6.1��56��.1�3�5<>186��04�3<513�9:�6.1�=/4�6� 41�0�83186�/8�6.1�5�<46�912�@�+6�6.1�>��6�1�6+92/�.�6.+6� .1�.+��@�4B13�/8�6.1�2+83��8�91.+2=��=�6.1�61>021�+83� >+31��>1�/>04�D1>186��+83�+2��>+31�0+:>186�6�� 6.1��#�014+6/D1��+8B�6�@+43��6.1�2�+8��.1�=/4�6� 41�0�83186�.+��8�6��<>>�813�6.1�2�+8�0+014��/852<3/87� 6.1�+7411>186�=4�>�6.1��+8B��1�3��8�6�B8�@�6�� @.�>�6.1�2�+8�@+��+56<+22:��+856/�813��8�6.1�+9�1851� �=�6.��1�415�43��+83�6.1�41D18<1�1864/1��=�4�6.1�4121D+86� 014/�3�+83��<9�1E<186�1864:�6/22�6.1��>183>186��56�@+�� /864�3<513�'��&&,(�/6�/��3/==/5<26�6��5�>1�6��+� 5�852<�/�8�6.+6�6.1�=/4�6�41�0�83186�@+��+56<+22:� 5<26/D+6/87�6/22/87�6.1�2+83��/8�E<1�6/�8�+��618+86�<8314� 6.1�+00122+86��8��&��+83�6.1�2+83��.+3�D1�613� /8�6.1��D148>186�+83�6.+6�6.1�=/4�6�41�0�83186� 5�86/8<13�6��5<26/D+61�6.1�2+83�6/22��15��@+�� /864�3<513��.141=�41��@1�+41�5�8D/8513�6.+6�6.1�=/4�6� 41�0�83186�@+��8�6�186/6213�=�4�74+86��=�2+83��/8� E<1�6/�8�<8314��15��+83�6.1�/>0<7813��4314�0+��13� 9:�6.1��15�83�41�0�83186�/��+7+/8�6�2+@�+83�=+56��.1� �4314�/>0<7813�/��6.141=�41�8�6��<�6+/8+921�/8�2+@�G

¶62

F&�� 8� 6.1� /8�6+86� 5+�1�� 6.1� +002/5+86��4/6� �16/6/�814�52+/>��74+86��=��55<0+85:�/8�41�0156��=�$�� +541��=�2+83��.1�415�43��=�4/7.6��=�6.1�2+83��3��8�6� 3/�52��1�6.1�8+>1��=�6.1�016/6/�814�+��+�618+86�/8� 5<26/D+6/�8�+��8��&��4�/>>13/+612:�04/�4� 6.1416��.1�4151/06��04�3<513�9:�6.1�016/6/�814�3��8�6� 3/�52��1�6.+6�+��8��&��.1�@+��18C�:/87�6.1� 04�0146:�+��+�618+86�� 8�014<�+2��=�6.1��4/7/8+2�415�43� @./5.�+41�>+31�+D+/2+921�9:�6.1��6.141�/��8�6./87 6��.�@�6.+6�+��8��&��4�/>>13/+612:�04/�4 6.141�6��6.1�016/6/�814�@+��/8��55<0+6/�8��=�+8: �015/=/13�2+83�=�4�@./5.�.1�.+3�52+/>13��55<0+85:�+��+ 618+86��.141=�41��6.1��+48+6+B+��00122+61��4/9<8+2�@+�� 4/7.6�+83�C<�6/=/13�/8�+00415/+6/87�6.1�1D/31851��8�415�43� +83�415�43/87�=/83/87�6.+6�6.141�@+��8�6./87�6��.�@� 6.+6�6.1�2+83�.+3��6��3�D1�613�/8��6+61��D148>186�9:� D/46<1��=��156/�8��=�6.1��56�+83�6.+6�6.1��4/6� �16/6/�814�@+��/8�0��1��/�8�+83�18C�:>186��=�6.1��+>1� />>13/+612:�04/�4�6��&��+83�.+3�5�86/8<13�@/6.� 6.1��+>1�+��8�6.1�3+61�6.1��>183>186��56�/�1�� +48+6+B+��+83��1=�4>��'�>183>186(��56��&&��5+>1� /86��=�451��8��<5.�5/45<>�6+851��3��8�6�=/83�+8:� /2217+2/6:�/8�6.1��4314�0+��13�9:�6.1��4/9<8+2�G�

Shri Babu Sapaliga v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Chikaveeradeshikendra Swamy Vs State of Karnataka

M/S S N S Plaza Vs Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

Dove Drive Without Borders Foundation Vs the Commissioner

M/S Fresco Foods Pvt. Ltd., Vs the Managing Director &

Shri Babu Sapaliga v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Chikaveeradeshikendra Swamy Vs State of Karnataka

M/S S N S Plaza Vs Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

Dove Drive Without Borders Foundation Vs the Commissioner

M/S Fresco Foods Pvt. Ltd., Vs the Managing Director &

A compact analysis

Syed Aslam Pasha Vs Ayaz Ahmed

G.a.Narayanswamy Vs State of Karnataka