Application to withdraw a filed appeal. The court accepted the withdrawal memo filed by the appellants and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn without adjudicating the merits.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL
R.S.A. NO.100022/2017 (PAR. & SEP. POSS.)
BETWEEN
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. M AMAREGOUDA, ADV.)
AND
: 2 :
OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: H.NO.180, W.NO.2, LINGAYATH STREET, JOLADARASI VILLAGE, TQ & DIST: BALLARI-583101.
... RESPONDENTS
(RESPONDENTS ARE SERVED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 14.09.2016 PASSED IN R.A.NO.29/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BALLARI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.06.2015, PASSED IN O.S. NO.75/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BALLARI, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
: 3 :
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a
memo to withdraw the present appeal, as the appellants are not interested to prosecute the above appeal against the respondents.
Said memo has been placed on record. Appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Rsh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. NAGHABHUSHANA GOUDA
SMT.VANAJAKSHI
SMT.HEMAVATHI
K. UMAPATHI GOUDA
SMT.GANGAMMA
SMT.SUSHEELAMMA
B.A. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
