This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award of the Principal District & Sessions Judge seeking enhancement of compensation was dismissed due to non-compliance of Office Objections.
Appeal dismissed due to non-compliance of Office Objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2018
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.9420 OF 2017
BETWEEN
ALL ARE R/AT CHANDRAKAVADI VILLAGE & POST, CHAMARAJANAGAR.
... APPELLANTS
(By Sri. P. SHIVAKUMAR, Smt. S. SUMATHI, Smt. N. PRIYA, Advocates)
AND:
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, K.S.R.T.C., CHAMARAJANAGAR DIVISION, KSRTC BUS STAND PREMISES, CHAMARAJANAGAR.
... RESPONDENT
2
MFA.No.9420/17
This MFA filed U/S 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated 20.02.2017 passed in MVC No.221/2016 on the file of the Principal District & Sessions Judge & MACT, Chamarajanagar, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time to take necessary steps, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed automatically without reference to the Court.
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt.13.08.2018 the Office Objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
T By: KL COPY
R By: DS
C By: MP
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Gowramma
Sumithra
Govinda
The Divisional Manager, K.S.R.T.C.
Raghendra S. Chauhan
H.T. Narendra Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
