Criminal revision petition filed under Section 397 Cr.P.C. dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioner failed to comply with a previous order granting time for office objections, having been absent at both hearings.
Revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 13th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100245 of 2017
BETWEEN:
M. GOPALRAO, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: BUSNIESS, R/O: NO.109, 2ND WARD, KALLAMMA STREET, BELLARY, DIST: BELLARY -583101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGAPPA B. MENASINAKAI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)
AND:
MD. AREEF, S/O IMAMSAB NADAF AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: #25, LAKKAMANHALLI INDUSTRIAL AREA, BEHIND D.G. SHETTY COLLEGE, NEAR KMF, P.B. ROAD, DHARWAD.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, COURT DHARWAD IN C.C.NO. 1029 OF 2016 ON 08.03.2017.
2
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Though the matter is called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
This Court on 28.09.2018 had finally granted a week’s time to do the needful and further ordered that failing which, the petition shall stand dismissed. It is seen that the office objections are still not complied with. In view of the aforesaid order, the revision petition stands
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
kmv
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. GOPALRAO
MD. AREEF
Mohammad Nawaz
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
